The function of today’s newspaper and television is to spread crucial news and to spread propaganda. I usually get my information on the Internet because personally -- I think it’s more efficient, convenient, and practical. I rarely watch the news or read the newspaper, I actually think its role in our contemporary society is diminishing. Why use other sources when you have the awesome Internet? Right lol? Despite the argument that news from television and newspapers are a dying meas of communication, it’s still a big factor in other people’s lives -- I guess the older generation (like my parents for example) can only get their information through television and the press...my parents are really computer illiterate, they wouldn’t know how to turn on a computer if I asked them to.
Most of the time, I get my notifications via friends; via facebook (haha). When I first discovered that Japan was hit by the horrific earthquake, I quickly got a rush of adrenaline and anxiety -- and quickly called my brother that is stationed in Japan. Thankfully he was okay, and was helping out Japan the very next day (he’s doing service in the Navy). So, my main point -- there are a lot of sources you can get your information from on important news -- I prefer the Internet because the Internet community is usually quick about anything, the spread of news is instant and fast.
The reason why I prefer the Internet rather than any other source: you get to choose what you want and when you want it. This is important to me, I dislike advertisements, and all the unnecessary hype that comes with television or especially the newspapers. For example, a few days after the incident in Japan, a lot of so-called “experts” were predicting that there will be aftershocks incoming to the west -- they provided little evidence, I usually take these type of stories as “hype” and don’t pay much attention to it, I always think to myself, “they’re just trying to get more viewers”. Or maybe I'm ignorant, and i don’t really know enough about earthquakes, or maybe i just don’t want to believe it. Either way, I wasn’t convinced with the little evidence they provided, it felt like hype to me. With the proper use of the Internet, you could choose what you want to watch, and pick out what really is important to you; whether it’s a specific location of where the earthquake hit to see if your loved ones are safe or to avoid the nuisance of jargon-filled media.
Overall, I think our means of spreading crucial news globally is impressive, it has improved throughout the years with many different varieties -- TV, newspapers, Internet, the social network..etc. My personal thoughts, I think the Internet is in direct competition with the other sources and will eventually achieve dominance over the others. It’s not a bad thing -- it’s more efficient. I use the Internet for just about everything, and I think it’s one of our greatest innovations of our time.
Most of the time, I get my notifications via friends; via facebook (haha). When I first discovered that Japan was hit by the horrific earthquake, I quickly got a rush of adrenaline and anxiety -- and quickly called my brother that is stationed in Japan. Thankfully he was okay, and was helping out Japan the very next day (he’s doing service in the Navy). So, my main point -- there are a lot of sources you can get your information from on important news -- I prefer the Internet because the Internet community is usually quick about anything, the spread of news is instant and fast.
The reason why I prefer the Internet rather than any other source: you get to choose what you want and when you want it. This is important to me, I dislike advertisements, and all the unnecessary hype that comes with television or especially the newspapers. For example, a few days after the incident in Japan, a lot of so-called “experts” were predicting that there will be aftershocks incoming to the west -- they provided little evidence, I usually take these type of stories as “hype” and don’t pay much attention to it, I always think to myself, “they’re just trying to get more viewers”. Or maybe I'm ignorant, and i don’t really know enough about earthquakes, or maybe i just don’t want to believe it. Either way, I wasn’t convinced with the little evidence they provided, it felt like hype to me. With the proper use of the Internet, you could choose what you want to watch, and pick out what really is important to you; whether it’s a specific location of where the earthquake hit to see if your loved ones are safe or to avoid the nuisance of jargon-filled media.
Overall, I think our means of spreading crucial news globally is impressive, it has improved throughout the years with many different varieties -- TV, newspapers, Internet, the social network..etc. My personal thoughts, I think the Internet is in direct competition with the other sources and will eventually achieve dominance over the others. It’s not a bad thing -- it’s more efficient. I use the Internet for just about everything, and I think it’s one of our greatest innovations of our time.